Forum Topic

Gavin
MemberTrilobiteJuly 25, 2012Many, many times other members and myself have put forward the possibility that the following film franchises all exist within the same fictional universe and are thus all canon to one another...
[center][b]Predator - AVP - Prometheus - Alien[/b][/center]
...Yet many, many naysayers and detractors voice their opinions stating this is not the case. 9 times out of 10, such arguments are subjective, from individuals whom don't like the idea.
Now, while some of those supporting the idea of these franchises existing within the same universe may also have subjective arguments, I do not. I have looked at this debate from an objective point of view and always reach the same conclusions...
- There is more information in the movies to suggest they are all set within the same fictional universe
- There is no contradictory information in the movies that states otherwise
- There has not been any official statement stating otherwise
To that end I challenge the naysayers to disprove, with verifiable sources for their information and statements, why these franchises are not part of the same universe.
July 25, 2012
Nrlfetmefan:
Mate, it seems to me so sensles such a request when you - one who defends the same universe stuff - can't present neither footage not even quotes from the dudes that made the ALIEN movies.
And there you go mate.
P.S.: Sir Ridley stated him self he hates AVP. Give us all a quote from an Alien movie maker that says "oh yes, Predators are in the same Universe, totally. You can't see them 'cause they are cloaked and stuff".
Guess what? You'll never find any of those. BECAUSE THEY ARE TWO DIFERENT MOVIE UNIVERSES.
Hope you feel enlightened now. If not... welll, sorry for that. Keep searching.
[b]Ask nothing from no one. Demand nothing from no one. Expect nothing from no one.[/b]
July 25, 2012
Quote from snorks:
- There is more information in the movies to suggest they are all set within the same fictional universe
- There is no contradictory information in the movies that states otherwise
- There has not been any official statement stating otherwise
Prove it wrong david1...that's all I ask.
ALL generalizations are WRONG!
July 25, 2012
lolololol. There is no information that my neighbours cat plays Dungeons & Dragons late at night... that surely means that he does.
[b]Ask nothing from no one. Demand nothing from no one. Expect nothing from no one.[/b]
July 25, 2012
One night I peeked into your neighbors house and saw two cats....I sh@t you not...playing d&d...the tabby was the dm.
ALL generalizations are WRONG!
July 25, 2012
LOLOLOL. good one.
[b]Ask nothing from no one. Demand nothing from no one. Expect nothing from no one.[/b]
July 25, 2012
@Nrlfetmefan
I can't help find this whole initial position and a lot of the following discussion a little odd, 'though?..
Isn't it hopeless to expect an objective of "Show declaration that X, Y and Z is not canon", to actually be answered?! As if we are discussing so many entries in Excel workbooks?..
What that objective would require, in actual practice, is that one Author would publicly denounce another Author's work as invalid: when neither of them own the Property under discussion and where the one Author has a relationship he wants to maintain with the Owner of the Property - he being a Studio - and also a professional reputation and personal life he probably wants to be kept free of bad blood, prima-donna drama, and ridiculous in-fighting... surely, this is an impossible position?
Furthermore, the objective seems to be setting a , "burden of disproof" - which does seem a little cart-before-the-horse, to me, but, nevertheless: in respect of [i]both[/i] these things, I can't help think that @Svanya, with her usual economy, has plotted the best and soundest course -
assuming you give additional weight to the opinions of those Author's with original or earliest interest in terms of defining the basis of canon, [which would seem reasonable], and also make an allowance for the diplomacy that will necessarily be required in the delivery of those opinions, [which would seem sensible and discriminating] - surely the objective is as good as answered?
July 25, 2012
I liked the idea of AVP in comic form just to satisfy my curiosity of how things might turn out but the films were B-movies at best. Ridley Scott said he didn't even watch any of the AVP's. I don't blame him, they suck, they suck bad. It was kind of a cool little Easter egg in Predator 2 of the "possible" Alien skull trophy, but any more than that is making a joke of both franchises.
Besides, the more interesting dilemma after age 20 is not who can kick whose ass but who are they, why do they want to kill us and how can we get out of this mess?
July 25, 2012
Of course we can always demonstrate without a shadow of a doubt that the Preds are in ALL ALIEN movies:
http://www.prometheus-movie.com/community/forums/topic/9366
[b]Ask nothing from no one. Demand nothing from no one. Expect nothing from no one.[/b]
July 25, 2012
@David 1, I do not agree with you with the Alien is the only canon. Ok Alien is a masterpiece but to say that the rest of movie is not canon is like saying I do not like the new trilogy of Star Wars and therefore is not canon.
IMHO the Canon is independent of taste or subjective statements of the fans.
regards
July 25, 2012
(high-fives) Nice work Snorkelbottom, I'm glad we finally cleared this up. It's a good thing this is finally once and for all settled.
July 25, 2012
Canon, wasn't he the heavy set TV Detective with the great voice???
[img]http://museumofuncutfunk.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/Frank-Cannon.jpg[/img]
July 25, 2012
^^ Hahah Patch!
[url=http://www.madmax4-movie.com/]Visit the Mad Max: Fury Road Forums today![/url]
July 26, 2012
- There is more information in the movies to suggest they are all set within the same fictional universe
[b]- There is no contradictory information in the movies that states otherwise[/b][i][u][/u][/i]
- There has not been any official statement stating otherwise
Like I said on page two,
Alien V Predator is set in 2004 with Charles Bishop Weyland as owner of Weyland Industries.
Prometheus has now told us that Weyland Industries didn't form until 2012 and was founded by Sir Peter Weyland.
Im going to side with Prometheus on this one as to what is canon.
Viddy well, little brother. Viddy well.
July 26, 2012
Shambhala,
don't, or I'll unleash MIDICLORIANS on your 'force'.
;)
2013 sci-fi horror novels 'Custodian' and 'Tandem' available from Amazon, B&N, iTunes etc...
July 26, 2012
@FreePlanet, all my sith lightning are directed to David 1 muahaha
[img]http://i1050.photobucket.com/albums/s402/Albertocrazy86/sw6_2004-palpatine-1.gif[/img]
July 26, 2012
Saw Prometheus yesterday evening. To me, neither Predator movies fit in the Alien storyline, considering the proto-Alien is born at the end of Prometheus.
Predator, Predator 2 and AvP movies show that Aliens and Eggs were present before earliest man civilizations. Predator 2 shows Alien skull on board of the Predator ship. How would that be possible, if the proto-Alien was born through an unexpected mixing between black ooze, humans, human-to-human transition and Engineers/SpaceJockeys, during the events on Prometheus, long, long after the events of Predator movies?
We suspect it takes another step for the proto-Alien to evolve into actual Aliens. Another combination must result in a Facehugger, Eggs and/or Alien Queen.
For actual Aliens to appear long before Prometheus, there would have to be an unlikely string of events exactly the same as on board of Prometheus: black ooze from the wazes+human male+human female=proto-Facehugger, proto-Facehugger+Engineer/SpaceJockey=proto-Alien. How likely is it, that such unusual mixing took place on numerous occasions before?
Actually, one could argue that Prometheus cancels out any Predator storylines in general, considering there were never Aliens for them to hunt before Prometheus first messed with the Engineer/SpaceJockey spaceship.
What do you guys think?
July 26, 2012
@Dustie, I see where you are coming from but you have forgotten one thing. The Derelict in Alien was on LV-426 for a long time, before the events of prometheus, and was carrying Eggs already.
Viddy well, little brother. Viddy well.
July 26, 2012
@alienamberclad
I do see your point. I don't think that the writers and directors are the people that get to dictate what exists and does not in the existing alien universe. I would think that would be left to the owners of the property. Who is that by the way? Is that fox or Giler and Hill? I am sure one of you can answer this....I can't.
@Brett
Good point...I have also wondered about the timeline where Charles Weyland vs Peter Weyland are concerned. Is Charles his father or uncle or something? Is there a clear timeline out there? After searching on the Internet a bit, I did find an alien wiki that suggests that Charles was his father, but the site also said that the "bishop" from alen3 was Michael Weyland. Michael was an engineer who designed the bishop model after his likeness and Michael happens to look very similar to Charles being a close relative. I don't know about all of that...seems a little scetchy.
@ dusty
The answer that we all are waiting for about the derelict from alien and all the eggs on board has yet to be shown. I always thought that the derelict was very old, older than the events during promet
ALL generalizations are WRONG!
July 26, 2012
i dont really like AVP, mainly on the ground that the xenomorph would slaughter the predator easily. the AVP disgrace the xenomorph.
I like the predator movies, its a prettty cool creature. not too sure about his weapony though....if he looked the wrong way a fired, he would shoot himself in the back of the head
"how do you feel?"-" great, next stupid question"