Not Available
Darth Shiro
MemberChestbursterNov-05-2016 11:48 AMI don't know but the clothes look the same. Also Facehuggers you were Chestbusters and Neomorpths while you were gone...
Dinosaurs incredible creatures who roamed the Earth 65 million years ago. Never had nature been filled with so much terror and beauty...
Something Real
MemberTrilobiteNov-05-2016 11:59 AMFACEHUGGERS! - It is very good to see you once more! You have brought a very fantastic point to light! Indeed, the articles of clothing you have presented are certainly similar! :)
Rick
MemberXenomorphNov-07-2016 5:50 AMFacehuggers,
I don't think she was an android. Look at her collar it is up like Peter's Collar. That would be a mamangement style, Peter with a single breast pocket like a suit jacket and Vickers having none. David's shirt is more utilitarian in nature given he is an android that would make sense.
Most corporations have a dress code. Like where I work. They require management to where button ups or company polo's, dress slacks, belts and fashionable steel toed shoes. Engineers (like myself) are required to where the same, unless they are working on the shop floor then they can where jeans, steel toed boats and a lab coat kind of like what David is wearing but blue.
Rick
Facehuggers
MemberNeomorphNov-07-2016 6:24 PM@Rick
Ah, that explains a lot! I learned quite a bit from your comment, never knew about management dresscode, thank you! :)
Rick
MemberXenomorphNov-08-2016 9:30 AMFacehuggers,
You got me thinking about the whole management thing (W-Y). This kind of goes off on a different tangent that may deserve a topic of its own. Let me explain. Before my last couple of positions I had been involved in a decades worth of contract engineering work. One of the companies I worked for was a small conglomerate that owned 20 something factories across the globe. But what a lot of people didn't know about the business was it was family owned (Vickers & Weyland comparison). The plant I worked at as an engineer was always running in the red (on purpose for tax right-offs), kind of reminds me of Weyland Corp. The spin off is the owners know what is going on in there business. It is in their own best interest to maintain some plausible deniability but NOT be disconnected from their biggest money maker/or loser.
What you think?
Rick