Forum Topic

zzplural
MemberOvomorphNovember 14, 2012It's a tricky one to answer, because a soul is a slippery beast.
The OED defines a soul as "The principle of intelligence, thought, or action in a person (or occas. an animal), typically regarded as an entity distinct from the body; the essential, immaterial, or spiritual part of a person or animal, as opposed to the physical."
You can quite happily regard a soul as an entity distinct from the body, but that doesn't actually tell you what it is.
And a spritual element? Well, we're drifting off into religious mumbo jumbo there.
You run into a similar problem when trying to define intelligence, where you have to resort to a "Turing Test" involving human judgement to say whether something is intelligent or not. There is no simple definition of what constitutes true intelligence.
Weyland says that David has no soul, but I disagree, given that neither he nor anyone else can define such a thing in absolute terms. I'd say that David has a soul, but it just happens to be a robotic soul, that's all.
The kind of soul that normal humans possess, on the other hand, happens to be one that is in large part hard-wired by virtue of our evolutionary past and allows humans to exist in our particular environmental niche. Nothing special, just the way that we are.
The most terrifying fact about the universe is not that it is hostile but that it is indifferent